MAKING SENSE OF THE SCENE

 

This past week I received e-mails from a good friend in which he expressed his perplexity with what’s happening in the field of Christian spirituality today. It would be a helpful way to end this brief series on the new spirituality by reflecting generally on the concerns he raised.

 

The first of these was the way in which spirituality, and particularly the new discipline of spiritual formation, seems to have taken over the traditional role of discipleship within churches and seminaries. Instead of encouraging new Christians to participate in a process of discipleship training, they are now encouraged to link up with a spiritual director for an extended course of spiritual formation. What’s happening here, my friend asked?

 

While I don’t have great expertise in this field I do have some perception of what’s behind this shift. Historically, discipleship training, at least within churches and parachurch organizations, has been orientated toward influencing what people believe and how they act. It has concentrated on getting them grounded in the doctrines of the faith and practices of Christian living. In some instances it has been heavily seasoned with denominational distinctives in terms of doctrines and/or practices.

 

This, in the minds of many, is more about religion (nurturing stereotyped beliefs and practices) than it is about spirituality (developing relationships and inward transformation). Hence the shift there has been from discipleship to spiritual formation. Instead of encouraging new Christians (and older believers for that matter too) to develop programmes of Bible reading and church attendance, spiritual directors help them get in touch with Christ and become increasingly like him. They stress the importance of developing intimacy with Jesus and of paying close attention to his words. In doing so, they emphasize the relational core of spiritual growth more than they do resultant outward practices.

 

While there is much to commend this emphasis, there are also dangers – and it was these my friend also alluded to in his correspondence. For one thing, in pursing relational intimacy spiritual directors tend to pay more attention to subjective experiences and devotional techniques than they do to understanding biblical truth. Historically evangelical Christians have understood spirituality as lived theology. It is simply the outward practical expression of relationship with the God who has revealed himself in the Bible. The key to developing a healthy spirituality, it has been argued for centuries, is sound theology. Spirituality without theology degenerates into sentimentality.

 

Worse than that, it can easily be taken captive by self-interest and psychology. Instead of being a reverential response to a glorious God who has revealed himself in creation and Scripture, spirituality can become the narcissistic pursuit of self-fulfilment. Self-realization and spiritual experience in itself become goals.

 

In many cases, the pursuit of experience takes people toward neo-pagan mysticism. Mysticism throughout the centuries has pursued immediate encounter with the divine. That’s resurfacing today in contemplative expressions of Christian spirituality. People are adopting forms of prayer and meditation (and in some cases bodily posture) that enable them to “enter the silence” or achieve altered states of consciousness in which they have elevated spiritual experiences.

 

Rightly, there are discerning Christians who are alarmed about this and warn against the dangers of the contemplative spirituality movement. Some have conducted extensive studies in which they have shown remarkable similarities in the techniques of contemplatives and mystics in other religions. They have also noted the openness of contemplatives to interfaith interaction based on commonness of method and experience. In alerting us to this they do us a service.

 

At the same time, this doesn’t mean to say that everything about the new flush of interest in spirituality is bad.  It does need discerning examination, and in particular, needs to be tested in terms of its commitment to the word of God as the basis of Christian experience. But at points it does offer healthy challenge and corrective to more traditional expressions of Christian life and devotion.